Energy Consumption Modeling in Activated Sludge Process Using Coupling PCA-ANFIS Approach

Document Type : Research Article


1 Laboratory of Faculty of Chemistry, Electrochemistry-Corrosion, Metallurgy and Mineral Chemistry, BP 32 El-Allia, PC 16111, USTHB, Algiers, ALGERIA

2 ENSTP, Laboratory of TPiTE, Bp 32 Kouba Algiers, ALGERIA

3 ENP, Ecole Nationale Polytechnique, B.P. 182-16200, El Harrach, Algiers, ALGERIA


The main challenge in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) by activated sludge process is the reduction of the energy consumption that varies according to the pollutant load of influent. However, this energy is fundamentally used for aerators in a biological process. The modeling of energy consumption according to the decision parameters deemed necessary for good control of the active sludge process namely the removal yields of parameters pollutant such as Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Suspended solids (SS) and Ammoniac (NH4+) that must meet the required standards. To achieve this objective, a coupling of two approaches, the principal components analysis (PCA) method and the Adaptatif Neural  Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model was envisaged, to improve the performance of fuzzy reasoning. Indeed, PCA as a factorization tool allowing the reducing of the variable that allows the reduction of the complexity of the studied phenomenon. The neuro-fuzzy learning from the data projected on the principal axes allows the improvement of the model, both in learning and validation periods. The comparative study between ANFIS model, the regression PCA model, and the coupling PCA-ANFIS method applied to the raw data was effected. The results indicate a significant improvement in the validation criteria obtained in the coupling PCA-ANFIS model compared to the other models for the learning and validation periods. The result shows that the coupling PCA-ANFIS can be used to extract information from data and to describe the nonlinearity of complex wastewater treatment processes.


Main Subjects

[1] Holenda B., Domokos Y., Reédey A´., Fazakas J., Aeration Optimization of a Wastewater Treatment Plant Using Genetic Algorithm, Optim. Control Appl. Meth., 28: 191–208 (2007).
[2] Ozturk M. C., Serrat F.M., Teymour F., Optimization of Aeration Profiles in the Activated Sludge Process, Chemical Engineering Science, 139:1–14 (2016).
[3] Rieger L., Alex J., Gujer W., Siegrist H., Modelling of Aeration Systems at Wastewater Treatment Plants, Water Science & Technology, 53: 439–447 (2006).
[4] Fernandez F.J., Castro M.C., Rodrigo M.A., Canizares P., Reduction of Aeration Costs by Tuning a Multi-set Point on/off Controller: A Case Study, Control Engineering Practice, 19: 1231–1237 (2011).
[5] Duchène Ph., Cotteux E., Capela S., Applying Fine Bubble Aeration to Small Aeration Tanks, Water Science & Technology, 44(2–3): 203–210 (2001).
[6] Gujer W., Henze M., Mino T., Van M., Activated Sludge Model No. 3, Water Sci. Technol., 39: 183–193 (1999).
[7] Henze M., Gujer W.,  Mino T., Matsuo T., Wentzel M.C., Gerrit v. R. Marais, Mark C. M. Van Loosdrecht, , Activated Sludge Model No.2d, ASM2D, Water Sci. Technol., 39 (1): 165-182 (1999).
[8] Maachou R., Lefkir A., Bermad A., Djaoui T., Khouider A., Statistical Analysis of Pollution Parameters in Activated Sludge Process, Desalination and Water Treatment, 72: 85–91 (2017)
[9] Qiao J., Li W., Han H., Soft Computing of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Using an Improved T–S Fuzzy Neural Network Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 22: 1254–1259 (2014).
[10] Civelekoglu G., Yigit N.O., Diamadopoulos E., Kitis M., Modelling of COD Removal in a Biological Wastewater Treatment Plant Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Artificial Neural Network, Water Science & Technology—WST, 60.6, (2009)
[12] Maachou R., Lefkir A., Merabtene T., Hamriche A., Bermad A., Contribution to Optimize Decision Parameters in Activated-Sludge Process Using ANFIS Model, MATEC Web of Conferences, 120: 05001 (2017)
[13] Agheri M., Mirbagheri S.A., Bagheri Z., Kamarkhani A.M., Modeling and Optimization of Activated Sludge Bulking for a Real Wastewater Treatment Plant Using Hybrid Artificial Neural Networks-Genetic Algorithm Approach, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 95: 12–25 (2015).
[15] Wan J., Huang M., Maa Y., Guoa W., Wanga Y., Zhangc, H Weijiang., Prediction of Effluent Quality of a Paper Mill Wastewater Treatment Using an Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System, Applied Soft Computing, 11: 3238–3246 (2011).
[17] Huang M., Yongwen Ma, Jinquan Wan , Yan Wang, Yangmei Chen, Changkyoo Yoo., Improving Nitrogen Removal Using a Fuzzy Neural Network-Based Control System in the Anoxic/Oxic Process, Environ Sci Pollut Res., 21: 12074–12084 (2014).
[18] Huang M., Wan J., Yan Wang, Yongwen Ma., Modeling of a Paper-Making Wastewater Treatment Process Using a Fuzzy Neural Network, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(5): 636-643 (2012).
[19] Maachou R., Lefkir A., Khouider A., Bermad A., Modeling of Activated Sludge Process Using Artificial Neuro-Fuzzy-Inference System (ANFIS), Desalination and Water Treatment, 57:45, 21182-21188, (2016).
[22] Huang M., Han W., Wan J., Ma Y., Chena. X.O., Multi-objective Optimisation for Design and Operation of Anaerobic Digestion Using GA-ANN and NSGA-IIJ Chem Technol Biotechnol, (2014)
[23] Traoré A., Grieu S., Frédérik T., Monique P., Colprim J., Control of Sludge Height in a Secondary Settler Using Fuzzy Algorithms, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 30: 1235–1242 (2006)
[25] Huang M., Ma Y., Jinquan W., Yan W., Yangmei C., Changkyoo Y, Improving Nitrogen Removal Using a Fuzzy Neural Control System in the Anoxic/Oxic Process, Environ Science Pollution Research, 21: 12074–12084 (2014)
[26] Tsai Y., Ouyang C F., Chiang W.L., Wu M.Y., Construction of an on-Line Fuzzy Controller for the Dynamic Activated Sludge Process, Water Research,28: 913-921 (1994)
[27] Fu C.S., Poch M., Fuzzy Model and Decision of COD Control for an Activated Sludge Process, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 93: 281-292 (1998).
[29] Anderson J.S., Kim H., McAvoy T.J., Hao O.J., Control of an Alternating Aerobic–Anoxic Activated Sludge System Part 1. Control Engineering Practice, 8: 271–278 (2000).
[30] Hao O.J., Huang J., Alternating Aerobic–Anoxic Process for Nitrogen Removal: Performance Evaluation, Water Environment Research, 68(1): 83–93 (1996).
[31] Huang J., Hao O.J., Alternating Aerobic–Anoxic Process for Nitrogen Removal: Dynamic Modeling, Water Environment Research, 68(1): 93–101 (1996)
[32] Heduit A., Ducheme P., Sintes L., Optimization of Nitrogen Removal in Small Activated Sludge Plants, Water Science and Technology, 22(3–4): 123–130 (1990).
[33] Lefkir A, MaachouR., Bermad A., KhouiderA., Factorization of Physicochemical Parameters of Activated Sludge Process Using the Principal Component Analysis, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57:43, 20292-20297 (2016)
[34] Jiao, Wei, Xiang, Shuguang, Quantitative Safety and Health Assessment Based on Fuzzy Inference and AHP at Preliminary Design Stage, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. (IJCCE), 35(4): 153-165 (2016)
[35] Teppola P., Mujunen S.P.,.Minkkinen P., Adaptive Fuzzy C-Means Clustering in Process Monitoring Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 45: 23-38 (1999).
[36] Saghatoleslami N., Mousavi M., Sargolzaei J., Khoshnood M., A Neuro-Fuzzy Model for a Dynamic Prediction of Milk Ultrafiltration Flux and Resistance, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. (IJCCE), 26(2): 53-61 (2007).
[37] Mohammed N., Ramli M., Azlan H., Badrul M.J., Bawadi A., Online Composition Prediction of a Debutanizer Column Using Artificial Neural Network, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. (IJCCE), 36(2): 153-175 (2017).
[38] Hreiz R., Latifi M.A., Roche N., Optimal Design and Operation of Activated Sludge Processes: State-of-the-Art, Chemical Engineering Journal, 281: 900-920 (2015)