A New Investigation on Tunnel Pool Fire Phenomenon Using CFD Technique

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, P.O. Box 179 Ardabil, I.R. IRAN

2 Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, I.R. IRAN

3 Department of Chemistry, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, I.R. IRAN

Abstract

In this study, the amount of generated pool fire, as a result of the release of chemicals in the case of an accident in tunnels, was simulated and the results were compared to the experimental data. At first, various amounts of spatial resolution (R*) were considered to compare the existing experimental data at different heights at the upstream, downstream and above the pool fire. The comparison studies showed that both numerical predictions and experimental measurements were, in general, comparable. Furthermore, FDS code was used to simulate the tunnel fire scenario for both cases of natural and forced ventilation. The grid using in the simulations is assessed by cells with the optimal spatial resolution and the influence of the ventilating systems on pool fire dynamic and its development was investigated. As a consequence, the temperature profile, O2, CO2, and visibility were compared in the two cases. These results showed that the ventilation system plays an important role in both fire development and heat removal by providing a safely evacuate rout in the tunnel.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Khan F.me., Abbasi S.A., Major Accidents in the Process Industries and an Analysis of Their Causes and Consequences, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 12(5): 361-374 (1999).
[2] Vilchez J.A., Sevilla S., Montiel H., Casal J., Historical Analysis of Accidents in Chemical Plants and in the Transportation of Hazardous Materials, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 8(2): 87–96 (1995).
[3] Charters D.A., Gray W.A., McIntosh. A.C., A Computer Model to Assess Fire Hazards in Tunnels (FASIT), Fire Technol., 30(1): 134-154 (1994).
[4] Grant G.B., Jagger S.F., Lea C.J., Fires in tunnels, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 356(1748): 2873-2906 (1998).
[5] Megret O., Vauquelin O., Model to Evaluate Tunnel Fire Characteristics, Fire Saf. J., 34(4): 393-401 (2000).
[6] Jafari A., Shahmohammadi A., Mousavi S.M., CFD Investigation of Gravitational Sedimentation Effect on Heat Transfer of a Nano-Ferrofluid, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng.(IJCCE), 34(1): 87-96 (2015).
[7] Carvel R.O., Beard A.N., Jowitt P.W., Drysdale D.D., The Influence of Tunnel Geometry and Ventilation on the Heat Release Rate of a Fire, Fire Technol., 40: 5-26 (2004).
[8] Ingason H., Lönnermark A., Heat Release Rates from Heavy Goods Vehicle Trailers in Tunnels, Fire Saf. J., 40: 646-668 (2005).
[9] Mouangue R., Onguene P.M., Zaida J.T., Ekobena H.P., Numerical Investigation of Critical Velocity in Reduced Scale Tunnel Fire with Constant Heat Release Rate, J. Combust., 2017: 1-12 (2017).
        DOI:10.3390/ijerph13101014.
[11] Muhasilovic M.,  Duhovnik J., CFD-Based Investigation of the Response of Mechanical Ventilation in the Case of Tunnel-Fire, J. Mech. Eng., 58(3): 183-190 (2012).
[12] Hwang C.C., Wargo J.D., Experimental Study of Thermally Generated Reverse Stratiļ¬ed Layers in a Fire Tunnel, Combust. Flame, 66(2): 171-180 (1986).
[13] Daish N.C., Linden P.F., “Interim Validation of Tunnel Fire Consequence Models: Comparison Between the Phase 1, Trails Data and the CREC/HSE Near-Fire Model”, Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants, FM88/92/6 (1994).
[14] Nazghelichi T., Jafari A., Kianmehr M.H., Aghbashlo M., CFD Simulation and Optimization of Factors Effecting the Performance of a Fluidized Bed Dryer, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng.(IJCCE), 32(4): 81-92 (2013).
[15] Gorji M., Bozorgmehry Boozarjomehry R., Kazemeini M., CFD Modeling of Gas-Liquid Hydrodynamics in a Stirred Tank Reactor, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng.(IJCCE), 26(2): 85-96 (2007).
[16] Kashef A., Benichou V., Lougheed G., Debs A., “Application of CFD Techniques for Modelling Fire Tests in Road Tunnels”, 12th Annual Conference of the Computational Fluid Dynamics Society of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 288-289 (2004).
[17] Shabanian S.R, Rahimi M., Khoshhal A., Abdulaziz Alsairafi A., CFD Study on Hydrogen-Air Premixed Combustion in a Micro Scale Chamber, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng.(IJCCE), 29(4): 161-172 (2010).
[18] Yucel N., Berberoglu M.me., Karaaslan S., Dinler N., Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Fire in a Scaled Underground Station, World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 40: 309-314 (2008).
[19] McGrattan K., “Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 4), Technical Reference Guide”, NIST Special Publication 1018, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, (2004).
[20] Dreisbach J., McGrattan K., “Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications”, Volume 7: “Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS)”, NUREG-1824 Final Report, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, May (2007).
[21] Wang H.Y., Coutin M., Most J.M., Large Eddy Simulation of Buoyancy-Driven Fire Propagation Behind a Pyrolysis Zone Along a Vertical Wall, Fire Saf. J., 37(3): 259-585 (2002).
[22] Ma T.G., Quintiere J.G., Numerical Simulation of Axi-Symmetric Fire Plumes: Accuracy and Limitations, Fire Saf. J., 38: 467-492 (2003).
[23] Aghaaliakbari B., Jafari Jaid A., Zeinali M.A.A., Computational Simulation of Ablation Phenomena in Glass-filled Phenolic Composites, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng.(IJCCE), 34(1): 97-106 (2015).
[26] Smagorinsky J., General Circulation Experiments with the Primitive Equations, I-The Basic Experiment, Mon. Weather Rev., 91(3): 99–164 (1963).
[27] Kang K., Prediction of Smoke Visibility During an Underground Rail Station Fire, Int. Assoc. Fire Saf. Sci., 1: 1-13 (2007).
[28] Jin T., Yamada T., Irritating Effects of Fire Smoke on Visibility, Fire Sci. Technol., 5(1): 79-90 (1985).
        http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/intridl4.html.
[31] Rom W., “Environmental and Occupational Medicine”, 4th ed, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2007).