Performance Evaluation of Microfiltration and Centrifugation for Separating Suspended Solids from Fermented Molasses Solution

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 School of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, I.R. IRAN

2 Institutes of Mechanics, Shiraz, I.R. IRAN

Abstract

Ethanol is considered a renewable fuel that can be produced via fermentation of sugarcane molasses. The fermented solution that is fed to the distillation column has suspended solid content that tends to block distillation trays leading to low ethanol recovery. In this study, performances of microfiltration and centrifugation processes were investigated for the separation of suspended solids from the fermented solution of sugarcane molasses. The filtration process using a ceramic filter under pressure differences of 1, 2, 3, and 4 bars was studied. Based on the results of this study, the overall filtration process can be divided into three stages pore blocking, cake filtration, and cake layer compression which were more pronounced as pressure difference across filter media increased. In addition, increasing pressure difference across the filter caused a sharp decrease in permeate flux due to faster pore blocking and higher turbidity removal, 96.99% due to cake filtration, and compaction of the cake layer. A comparison of curve-fitted experimental data and blocking models showed that the full cake model had the best fit with an Average Absolute Relative Error (AARE) of 0.112. Further, in this study, experimental design was used to optimize the operating parameters of centrifugation for separation and removal of suspended solids from fermented solution. Single complete and complete-standard models among blocking models had the best fit for filtration after centrifugation under optimal operating conditions that correspond to the filtration pressure difference of 4 bars. The measured data showed that the permeate volume in centrifugation plus filtration increased about threefold compared to filtration alone, although the turbidity removal decreased slightly from 96.99 to 89.78%.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Gomes M.C.S., Moreira W.M., Paschoal S.M., Sipoli C.C., Suzuki R.M., Sgorlon J.G., Pereira N.C., Modeling of Fouling Mechanisms in the Biodiesel Purification Using Ceramic Membranes, Separation and Purification Technology, 269: 118595 (2021).
[2] Dalena F., Senatore A., Tursi A., Basile A., "Bioenergy Production from Second- and Third-Generation Feedstocks", Elsevier Ltd,  559-599 (2017).
[3] Najafpour G., Younesi H., Ku Ismail K.S., Ethanol Fermentation in an Immobilized Cell Reactor Using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae, Bioresour. Technol., 92(3): 251-260 (2004).
[4] Santos F., Eichler P., de Queiroz J.H., Gomes F., "Production of Second-Generation Ethanol from Sugarcane", Elsevier Inc., 195-228 (2020).
[5] Cardona Alzate C.A., Sánchez Toro O.J., Energy Consumption Analysis of Integrated Flowsheets for Production of Fuel Ethanol from Lignocellulosic Biomass, Energy, 31(13): 2447-2459 (2006).
[6] Bajpai P., "Advances in Bioethanol", Springer Briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, 1-12 (2013).
[7] Baptista C.M.S.G., Cóias J.M.A., Oliveira A.C.M., Natural Immobilisation of Microorganisms for Continuous Ethanol Production, Enzyme. Microb. Technol., 40(1): 127-131 (2006).
[8] Göksungur Y., Zorlu N., Production of Ethanol from Beet Molasses by Ca-Alginate Immobilized Yeast Cells in a Packed-Bed Bioreactor, Turkish J. Biol., 25(3): 265-275 (2001).
[9] Sjölin M., Thuvander J., Wallberg O., Lipnizki F., Purification of Sucrose in Sugar Beet Molasses by Utilizing Ceramic Nanofiltration and Ultrafiltration Membranes, Membranes, 10(1): 5 (2019).
[10] Saha K., Maharana A., Sikder J., Chakraborty S., Curcio S., Drioli E., Continuous Production of Bioethanol from Sugarcane Bagasse and Downstream Purification Using Membrane Integrated Bioreactor, Catalysis Today, 331: 68-77 (2019).
[11] Chi Tien., "Principles of Filtration", Elsevier Science (2012).
[12] Grenier A., Meireles M., Aimar P., Carvin P., Analysing Flux Decline in Dead-End Filtration, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 86(11): 1281-1293 (2008).
[13] Heidari S., Amirinejad M., Mirzadeh S.S., Wood D.A., Insights into Colloidal Membrane Fouling Mechanisms for Nanofiltration of Surface Water Using Single and Hybrid Membrane Processes, Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 32(6): 2517-2530 (2021).
[14] Gonsalves V.E., A Crit́ical Investigation on the Viscose Filtration Process, Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays‐Bas, 69(7): 873-903 (1950).
[15] Grace H.P., Structure and Performance of Filter Media, AIChE Journal, 2(3): 307-15 (1956).
[16] Shirato M., Aragaki T., Iritiani E ., Blocking Filtration Laws for Filtration Law Non-Newtonian Fluids, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 12(2): 162-164 (1979).
[17] Jacques H., Mathematical Models and Design Methods in Solid-Liquid Separation, NATO ASI Ser. Ser. E Appl. Sci., 88: 83-89 (1985).
[18] Bolton G., Lacasse D., Kuriyel R., Combined Models of Membrane Fouling : Development and Application to Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration of Biological Fluids, Journal of Membrane Science, 277: 75-84 (2006).
 [19] Bowen W.R., Gan Q., Properties of Microfiltration Membranes: Flux Loss during Constant Pressure Permeation of Bovine Serum Albumin, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 38(7): 688-696 (1991).
[20] Mahesh Kumar S., Roy S., Filtration Characteristics in Dead-End Microfiltration of Living Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Cells by Alumina Membranes, Desalination, 229(1-3): 348-361 (2008).
[21] Sampath M., Shukla A., Rathore A.S., Modeling of Filtration Processes—Microfiltration and Depth Filtration for Harvest of a Therapeutic Protein Expressed in Pichia Pastoris at Constant Pressure, Bioengineering, 1(4): 260-277 (2014).
[22] Zhu Z., Mhemdi H., Dead end Ultra- Fi Ltration of Sugar Beet Juice Expressed from Cold Electrically Pre-Treated Slices : Effect of Membrane Polymer on Fouling Mechanism and Permeate Quality, Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 36: 75-82 (2016).
[23] Kovaleva O.A., Lazarev S.I., Kovalev S.V., Effect of Transmembrane Pressure on Microfiltration Concentration of Yeast Biomass, Petroleum Chemistry, 57: 974-982 (2017).
[24] Saleem M., Alibardi L., Cossu R., Cristina M., Spagni A., Analysis of Fouling Development under Dynamic Membrane Filtration Operation, Chem. Eng. J., 312: 136-143 (2017).
[25] Shi C., Rackemann D.W., Moghaddam L., Wei B., Li K., Lu H., Xie C., Hang F., Doherty W.O., Ceramic Membrane Filtration of Factory Sugarcane Juice: Effect of Pretreatment on Permeate Flux, Juice Quality and Fouling, Jou. Food Eng., 243: 101-113 (2019).
[26] Choobar B.G., Shahmirzadi M.A.A., Kargari A., Manouchehri M., Fouling Mechanism Identification and Analysis in Microfiltration of Laundry Wastewater., Jou. Envir. Chem. Eng., 7(2): 103030 (2019).
[27] Schippers J.C., Verdouw J., The Modified Fouling Index, a Method of Determining the Fouling Characteristics of Water, Desalination, 32: 137-148 (1980).
Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Volume 42, Issue 11 - Serial Number 133
November 2023
Pages 3917-3928

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics