Comparison of Alcohol Free GSH Production by Ultrasonic and Homogenizing Method

Document Type : Research Note


Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak 53100, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA


Homogenizer and ultrasonicator that we call as mechanical methods were used in the lab scale production of alcohol free reduced glutathione (alcohol free GSH) from baker’s yeast. The study was done to determine the effects of specific parameters of the methods and the pH of the medium on the production of the GSH. The cell disruptions were run at a wide range of those parameters at the suitable common parameters of the methods. The disrupted cells suspension was then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min and the GSH content in the supernatant was analyzed by taking the absorbance (A) value of the solution by spectrophotometer at 412 nm. The results obtained showed that the production of GSH was affected by the adjusted specific parameters of each method and the yield of production by the homogenizing and ultrasonic method was found 3.3 and 4.1 times, respectively, better than the yield of production by the unadjusted parameters. Ultrasonic method which produced 23.2 mg/L product was found 1.3 times better than the homogenizing method (18.5 mg/L) in producing the GSH. The result obtained from the lab scale study of the above mentioned mechanical methods showed that the implementation of them in the large scale production of the alcohol free GSH is possible. 


Main Subjects

1] Stephen, D.W., Jamieson, D.J., Glutathione is an Important Antioxidant Molecule in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEMS. Microbiol. Lett., 141, 207(1996).
[2] Li, Y., Chen, J., Song, Q., Katakura, Y., Lun, S.Y., Fed-Batch Culture Strategy for High Yield of Baker's Yeast with High Fermentative Activity,Chin. J. Biotechnol., 13, 105 (1997).
[3] Shimizu, H., Araki, K., Shioya, S., Suga, K., Optimal Production of Glutathione by Controlling the Specific Growth Rate of Yeast in Fed-Batch Culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 38, 196 (1991).
[4] Sakato, K., Tanaka, H.¸ Advanced Control of Glutathione Fermentation Process, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 40, 904 (1992).
[5] Alfafara, C., Kanda, A., Araki, K., Shimizu, H., Shioya, S., Suga, K., Effect of Amino Acids on Glutathione Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 36, 538 (1992).
[6] Alfafara, C., Miura, K., Shimizu, H., Shioya, S., Suga, K., Cysteine Addition Strategy for Maximum Glutathione Production in Fed-Batch Culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 37, 141 (1992).
[7] Li, Y., Chen, J., Mao, Y.Y., Lun, S., Koo, Y.M., Effect of Additives and Fed-Batch Culture Strategies on the Production of GSH by Recombinant Escherichia coli, Process. Biochem., 33, 709 (1998).
[8] Liu, C.H., Hwang, Ch.F., Liao, Ch.Ch., Medium Optimization for Glutathione Production by Saccharomyces  cerevisiae,  Process Biochem., 34, 17 (1999).
[9] Wei, G., Li, Y., Du, G.h., Chen, J., Effect of Surfactants on Extracellular Accumulation of Glutathione by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Process Biochem., 38, 1125 (2003).
[10] Lin, J.P., Tian, J., You, J.F., Jin, Z.H., Xu, Z.N., Cen, P.L., An Effective Strategy for the Co-Production of S-adenosyl-L-Methionine and GSH by Fed-Batch Fermentation, Biochem. Eng. J., 21, 19 (2004).
[11] Liu, H., Lin, J.P., Cen, P.L., Pan, Y.J., Co-Production of S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine and GSH from Spent Brewer’s Yeast Cells, Process Biochem., 39, 1993 (2004).
[12] Wang, Z., Tan, T., Song, J., Effect of Amino Acids Addition and Feedback Control Strategies on the High-Cell-Density Cultivation, Process Biochem., 42, 108 (2007).
[13] Homogenization-Cosmetic,  Pharma  &  Biotech:  http:// www. niroinc. com/ html/ fammap. html., Nov. (2003).
[14] Homogenization Significantly Improves the Quality of Your Product: http://www.bykowskiequipment. com., Nov. (2003).
[15] Alliger, H., Ultrasonic Disruption, Am. Lab., 10, 75 (1975).
[16] Povey, M.J.W., Mason, T.J., Ultrasound in Food Processing, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK (1998).
[17] Sauer, T., Robinson, C.W., Glick, B.R., Disruption of Native and Recombinant Escherichia coli in a High Pressure Homogenizer, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 33, 1330 (1989).
[18] Zhang, Z., Blewett, J.M., Thomas, C.R., Modelling the Effect of Osmolality on the Bursting Strength of Yeast Cells, J. Biotechnol., 71, 17 (1999).
[19] John, R.W., Alan, V.Q., Evaluation of the Potential of a Beadmill for the Release of Intracellular Bacterial Enzymes, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 4, 385 (1982).
[20] Lyng, J.G., Allen, P., McKenna, B.M., The Influence of High Intensity Ultrasound Baths on Aspects of Beef Tenderness, J. Muscle Foods, 8, 237 (1997).
[21] Nandakumar, R., Gounot, A.M., Mattiasson, B., Gentle Lysis of Mucous Producing Cold-Adapted Bacteria by Surfactant Treatment Combined with Mechanical Disruption,J. Biotechnol., 83, 211