Direct Bubble Size Measurement in a Mechanical Flotation Cell by Image Analysis and Laser Diffraction Technique - A Comparative Study

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Mining Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU), Qazvin, I.R. IRAN

Abstract

In this study, a comparative measurement of bubble sizes in a two-phased medium (water and air) was performed in a mechanical flotation cell by Image Analysis (IA) and Laser Diffraction (LD) methods. The bubbles were generated in a mechanical cell with dimensions of 25*15*17 cm3. To determine the bubbles' size by the LD method, the bubbles were transferred from the cell to the Laser Particle Size Analyzer (LPSA) device through a hole in the cell, and Db(50) of bubbles were also calculated from their scattering pattern data. A bubble viewer, made of Plexiglass with certain dimensions, including two main parts (sampling tube and viewing chamber) was employed for the IA method. Comparative experiments were conducted in the different conditions affecting the bubble sizes, which are the impeller speed, solution temperature, pH value, and frother types. Results indicated that the two measurement methods were in good agreement while bubbles' sizes were in a range of +400-800 microns. The difference between LD and IA results was less than 7% in the range of +400-800. In the size range of -200 microns, LD and IA results difference increased to 36%. Moreover, in all experiments with the same conditions, the size of the bubbles by the LD method was recorded smaller than that by the IA method. Considering the fact that bubbles in the mechanical flotation cell are usually in the size range of +600 -2000 microns, and in this range, LD and IA results had a negligible disagreement, LD can be successfully employed for the bubble size measurement in mechanical flotation cells.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Bailey M.E., “Analysis of Bubble Size Distributions Using the McGill Bubble Size Analyser.”,  MSc. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (2004).
[2] Besagni, G., Inzoli. F., Ziegenhein, T. Two-Phase Bubble Column: A Comprehensive Review, ChemEngineering , 2(2):13-(2018).
[3] Ahmed N., Jameson G.J., The Effect of Bubble Size on the Rate of Flotation of Fine Particles, Int J. of Min. Proc., 14: 195–215 (1985).
[4] Yoon R.H., Luttrell G.H., The Effect of Bubble Size on Fine Particle Flotation, Minerals Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 5: 101–122 (1989).
[5] Gorain B.K., Franzidis J.P., Manlapig E.V., Studies on Impeller Type, Impeller Speed and Air Flow Rate in An Industrial Scale Flotation Cell .4. Effect of Bubble Surface Area Flux on Flotation Performance, Minerals Engineering, 10(4): 367-379 (1997).
[6] Kamali Moaveni A., Design, Construction, and Performance Test of a Laboratory Column Flotation Apparatus, Montan University (2015).
[7] Prakash R., Majumder S.K., Singh A., Flotation Technique: Its Mechanisms and Design Parameters, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 127: 249-270 (2018).
[8] Jung S.Y., Park H.W., LEE S.J., Simultaneous Measurement of Bubble Size, Velocity and Void Fraction In Two-Phase Bubbly Flows with Time-Resolved X-Ray Imaging, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, 21: 424-429 (2014).
[9] Thomas B.G., Dennisov A., Bai H., “Behavior of Argon Bubbles During Continuous Casting of Steel”, The Proceeding of 80th Steelmaking Conference, 13-16, Chicago (1997).
[10] Nikhita B., Deekshith P., Guguluto S. K., A Review of Methodologies to Determine Bubble Diameter and Bubble Velocity, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2: 2250-3153 (2012).
[11] Pandit A.B., Varley J., Thrope R.B., Davidson J.F., Measurement of Bubble Size Distribution - An Acoustic Technique, Chemical Engineering Science, 47: 1079-1089 (1992).
[12] Ksentini I., Kotti M., Ben Mansour L., Effect of Liquid Phase Physicochemical Characteristics on Hydrodynamics of an Electroflotation Column, Desalination and Water Treatment, 800279, 1-8, (2013)
[13] Nesset J.E., Hernandez-Aguilar J.R., Acuna C., Gomez C.O., Finch J.A., Some Gas Dispersion Characteristics of Mechanical Flotation Machines, Minerals Engineering, 19: 807–815 (2006).
[14] Hernandez-Aguilar J.R., Gomez C.O., Finch J.A., A Technique for the Direct Measurement of Bubble Size Distributions in Industrial Flotation Cells, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, 389-402 (2002).
[15] Rodrigues R.T., Rubio J., New basis for Measuring the Size Distribution of Bubbles, Minerals Engineering, 16(8): 757-765 (2003).
[16] Xu R., Particle Characterization: Light Scattering Methods, Particle Technology Series, Chap. 3., (2002).
[17]  ISO 13320-1, 1999(E). Particle Size Analysis- Laser Diffraction Methods, Part 1, General Principals.
[18] Couto H.J.B., Melo M.V., Massarami G., Treatment of Milk Industry Effluent by Dissolved Air Flotation, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 21: 83-91 (2004).
[19] Hudson J.B., Couto, Danial G. N., Reiner N., Silvia C.A., Micro-Bubble Size Distribution Measurements by Laser Diffraction Technique, Minerals Engineering, 22: 330-335 (2008).
[20] “Particle Size Analysis-Laser Diffraction Methods, BS ISO 13320:2009”.
[21] Azgomi F., “Characterizing Frothers by Their Bubble Size Control Properties”,  MSc. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (2006).
[22] Moyo P., “Characterization of Frothers by Water Carrying Rate”, Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (2005).
[23] Finch J.A., Gelinas S., Moyo P., Frother-Related Research at McGill University, Minerals Engineering, 19: 726–733 (2006).
[24] Khoshdast H., Sam A., Flotation Frothers: Review of Their Classifications, Properties and Preparation, The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 4: 25-44 (2011).
[25] Przemyslaw B.K., Determination of Critical Coalescence Concentration and Bubble Size for Surfactants Used as Flotation Frothers, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52: 11752 −11757 (2013).
[26] Zhang W., Nesset J.E., Rao R.., Finch J.A., Characterizing Frothers Through Critical Coalescence Concentration (CCC) 95-Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) Relationship, Minerals, 2: 208−227 (2012).
[27] Nesset J.E., Finch J.A., Gomez C.O., “Operating Variables Affecting Bubble Size in Force-Air Mechanical Flotation Machines”, Proceeding of the 9th Mill Operators Conference, Fremantle, Australia, March 19–21, (2007).
[28] Dobby G.S., Finch J.A., Particle Collection in Columns- Gas Rate and Bubble Size Effects, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 25: 9-13 (1986).
[29] Gupta A.K., Banerjee P.K., Mishra A., Satish P., Effect of Alcohol and Polyglycol Ether Frothers on Foam Stability, Bubble Size and Coal Flotation, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 82: 126– 37 (2007).
[30] Shahbazi B., Rezaei B., The Effect of Type and Dosage of Frothers on Coarse Particles Flotation, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE), 28(1): 95-101 (2009).
[31] Jin F., Li J., Ye X., Wu Ch., Effects of pH and Ionic Strength on the Stability of Nanobubbles in Aqueous Solutions of R-Cyclodextrin, Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 111: 11745-11749 (2007).
[32] Elmashdy A.M., Mirnezami M., Finch J.A., Zeta Potential of Air Bubbles in Presence of Frothers, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 89: 40–43 (2008).
[33] Wu Ch., Nesset K., Masliyah J., Xu Z., Generation and Characterization of Submicron Size Bubbles, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 123–132 (2012).
[34] Jin, F., Li, J., Ye, X., Wu, Ch. Effects of pH and Ionic Strength on the Stability of Nanobubbles in Aqueous Solutions of r-Cyclodextrin, J. Phys. Chem. B, 111: 11745-11749 (2007).
[35] Phan Ch.M., Nakahara H., Shibata O., Moroi Y., Le T.N., Ang H.M. 'Surface Potential of Methyl Isobutyl Carbinol Adsorption Layer at the Air/Water Interface, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 116: 980–986 (2012).
[36] Zhang W., Nesset J.E., Finch J.A., Bubble Size as a Function of Some Situational Variables in Mechanical Flotation Machines, Journal of Central South University, 21: 720−727 (2014).
[37] Wang L.K., Shammas N.K., Selke W.A., Aulenbach D.B., “Gas Dissolution, Release, and Bubble Formation in Flotation Systems, Handbook of Environmental Engineering”, Volume 12: Flotation Technology (2010).
[38] Najafi A., Drelich J., Yeung A., Xu Z., Masliyah J., A Novel Method of Measuring Electrophoretic Mobility of Gas Bubbles, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 308: 344–350 (2007).
[39] Ahmadi R., “Flotation of Fine Particles from Mine Tailings by Coalescent of Nano-microbubbles”, Ph.D. Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
[40] Zhang X. H., Li G., Wu Z.H., Zhang X. D., Hu J., Effect of Temperature on the Morphology of Nanobubbles at Mica/Water Interface, Chinese Physics, 14(9): 1774-05 (2005).
[41] Seguineau De Preval E., Fabrice D., Gilles M., Gérard C., Samir M., Influence of Surface Properties and Bulk Viscosity on Bubble Sizeprediction During Foaming Operation, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 442: 88–97 (2014).
[42] Gorain B.K., Franzidis J.P., Manlapig E.V., Studies on Impeller Type, Impeller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 4: Effect of Bubble Surface Area Flux on Flotation Performance, Minerals Engineering, 10: 367–379 (1997).
[43] Miskovic S., “An Investigation of the Gas Dispersion Properties of Mechanical Flotation Cells: An In-Situ Approach”, Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia (2011).
[44] Yang X., Aldrich CH., Effects of Impeller Speed and Aeration Rate on Flotation Performance of Sulphide Ore, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 16: 185-190 (2005).
[45] Javor Z., Schreithofer N., Heiskanen K., Kernel Functions to Flotation Bubble Size Distributions, Minerals Engineering, 125: 200-205 (2018).
[46] Mesa D., Morrison A.J., Brito-Parada P.R., “Effect of Impeller Design on Bubble Size and Froth Stability”, International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC), Moscow, September 16-21 (2018).
[47] Sawyerr F., Deglon D.A., O’connor C.T., Prediction of Bubble Size Distribution In mechanical Flotation Cells, The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 98(45): 179-185 (1998).
[48] Gorain, B.K., Franzidis, J.P., Manlapig, E.V., The Empirical Prediction of Bubble Surface Area Flux in Mechanical Flotation Cells From Cell Design and Operation Data, Minerals Engineering, 12: 309-322 (1999).
[49] Grau R.A., Heiskanen K., Bubble Size Distribution in Laboratory Scale Flotation Cells, Minerals Engineering, 18: 1164–1172 (2005).
[50] Azgomi F., Gomez C.O., Finch J.A., Correspondence of Gas Holdup and Bubble Size in Presence of Different Frothers, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 83: 1–11 (2007)
[51] Finch J.A., Nesset J., Acuna C., Role of Frother on Bubble Production and Behaviour in Flotation, Minerals Engineering, 21: 949−957 (2008).
Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Volume 40, Issue 5 - Serial Number 109
September and October 2021
Pages 1653-1664

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics