Evaluation of Spent Catalyst Structure Changes during Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation in Different Technologies

Document Type : Research Article


1 Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, PO Box 51335/1996, Tabriz, I.R. IRAN

2 Environmental Engineering Research Center (EERC), Sahand University of Technology, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, Iran

3 r.alizadeh@sut.ac.ir


Ethylbenzene (EB) dehydrogenation to styrene (SM) on an industrial scale is generally performed using classic and SMART (Styrene Monomer Advanced Reheat Technology) technologies. In the current study, spent catalysts structural changes through classic and SMART technologies were investigated and compared with the fresh catalyst. For this purpose, XRF, XRD, SEM-EDX, FT-IR, BET and crushing strength analysis were employed. It was found that styrene production via SMART technology with 40% potassium loss is led to more catalyst deactivation than the classic ones (26%). Due to pore mouth blocking by coke formation, the average pore radius in both classic and SMART spent catalysts is reduced about 33% and 53% compared to the fresh ones, respectively. SEM analysis showed that potassium migration mechanism is related to the temperature gradient in the classic spent catalysts and chemical vapour transportation in the SMART spent catalysts. Comparative evaluation of the catalysts performance indicated that the SMART spent catalyst with about 72% activity loss is more deactivated than the classic ones (61%).The large drop of styrene yield (72-74%) of SMART spent catalyst revealed that the activity is more depending on the pore mouth size, rather than the specific surface area. However, in situ steam injection redistributed migrated potassium and increased the selectivity of the classic spent catalyst, but it was led to more potassium migration and catalyst deactivation in the SMART spent ones. According to this study, styrene production and industrial unit design based on SMART technology not recommended strongly.


Main Subjects

[1] James D.H., Castor W.M., "Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry", Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., Weinheim (2011).
[2] Scheirs J., Priddy D., "Modern Styrenic Polymers", John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim (2003).
[3] Tamsilian Y., Ebrahimi A.N., Ramazani A., Abdollahzadeh H., Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of Styrene Monomer Production Process and Investigation of Catalyst Behavior, Comput. Chem. Eng., 40(1):1-11 (2012).
[5] Cavani F., Trifiro F., Alternative Processes for the Production of Styrene, Appl. Catal. A.: General, 133(2):219-239 (1995).
[6] Arpe H.J., "Industrial Organic Chemistry", Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., Weinheim (2010).
[7] Khatamian M., Khandar A.A., Haghighi M., Ghadiri M., Nano ZSM-5 Type Ferrisilicates as Novel Catalysts for Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation in the Presence of N2O, Appl. Surf. Sci., 258(2):865-872 (2011).
[8] Castro A.J.R., Soares J.M., Filho J.M., Oliveira A.C., Campos A., Milet E.R.C., Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene with CO2 for Styrene Production over Porous Iron-based Catalysts, Fuel, 108(1):740-748 (2013).
[9] Humin Y., Hong L., Jilong W., Tao W., Wenjun Y., Xiaoli H., Jiejun B., Guoping X., Development Status of Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation Catalysts, Ind. Catal., 20(1):13-18 (2012).
[10] Tahriri-Zangeneh F., Taeb A., Gholivand K., Sahebdelfar S., The Effect of Alkali Metal Promoters on the Stability and Coke Formation of Platinum-Based Propane Dehydrogenation Catalysts: A Kinetic Study, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng.(IJCCE), 32(4):25-32 (2013).
[11] Mross W.D., Alkali Doping in Heterogeneous Catalysis, Cataly. Rev., 25(4):591-637 (1983).
[12] Herzogt, B.D., Rase, H.F., In Situ Catalyst Reactivation: Spent Ethylbenzene Catalyst with Agglomerated Potassium Promoter, Ind. Eng. Chem. Dev., 23(2):187-196 (1984). 
[13] Matsui J., Sodesawa T., Nozaki F., Activity Decay of Potassium-Promoted Iron Oxide Catalyst for Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene, Appl. Catal. A.: General, 51(1):203-211 (1989).
[15] Serafin I., Kotarba A., Grzywa M., Sojka Z., Binczycka H. Kustrowski P., Quenching of Potassium Loss from Styrene Catalyst: Effect of Cr Doping on Stabilization of the K2Fe22O34 Active Phase, J. Catal., 239(1):137-144 (2006).
[16] Bieniasz W., Trebala M., Sojka Z., Kotarba A., Irreversible Deactivation of Styrene Catalyst due to Potassium Loss—Development of Antidote via Mechanism Pinning, Catal. Today, 154(3-4):224-228 (2010).
[17] Rossetti I., Bencini E., Trentini L., Forni, L., Study of the Deactivation of a Commercial Catalyst for Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation to Styrene, Appl. Catal. A.: General, 292(1):118-123 (2005).
[18] Meima G.R., Menon P.G., Catalyst Deactivation Phenomena in Styrene Production, Appl. Catal. A.: General, 212(1-2):239-245 (2001).
[19] Mousavi S., Panahi P., Niaei A., Modeling and Simulation of Styrene Monomer Reactor: Mathematical and Artificial Neural Network ModelInt. J. Sci. Eng. Res.(IJSER), 3(3):1-7 (2012).   
[21] Lee W.J., Froment G.F., Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation into Styrene: Kinetic Modeling and Reactor Simulation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(23):9183-9194 (2008).
[22] Baghalha M., Ebrahimpour O., Structural Changes and Surface Activities of Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation Catalysts during Deactivation, Appl. Catal. A: General, 326(2):143-151 (2007).
[23] Shijie L., Tong C., Changxi M., Weimin Y., Zaiku X., Qingling C., Deactivation of the Industrial Catalyst for Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation to Styrene, Chinese J. Catal., 29(2):179-184 (2008).
[24] Muhler M., Schutze J., Wesemann M., Rayment T., Dent A., Schlogl R. Ertl G., The Nature of the Iron Oxide-based Catalyst for Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene to Styrene: I. Solid-state Chemistry and Bulk Characterization, J. Catal., 126(2):339-360 (1990).
[25] Ndlela S.C., Shanks B.H., Reducibility of Potassium-Promoted Iron Oxide under Hydrogen Conditions, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(10):2112-2121 (2003).
[26] Subrt J., Vins J., Shapygin I.S., Zakharov A.A., Reactivity of Finely Dispersed Iron Oxides in Solid State Reactions, Thermochim. Acta., 93(1):489-492 (1985).
[27] Gregg S.J., Sing K.S.W., "Adsorption, Surface Area, and Porosity", Academic Press, London (1995).
[28] Kopinke F.D., Zimmermann G., Reyniers G., Froment G.F., Relative Rates of Coke Formation from Hydrocarbons in Steam Cracking of Naphtha. 3. Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32(11):2620-2625 (1993).
[29] Guisnet M., Magnoux P., Organic Chemistry of Coke Formation, Appl. Catal. A: General, 212(1-2): 83-96 (2001).