A Comparative Study of Alkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate Using Design of Experiments

Document Type : Research Article


Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, PAKISTAN



Alkaline hydrolysis of ethyl acetate is essentially an irreversible and second order reaction. Industrial importance of the reaction product, sodium acetate, necessitate for process improvement in terms of maximum conversion and economical usage of raw materials. Statistical design of experiments was utilized to enhance conversion in both batch and plug flow reactors.A full two level factorial design was used to screen out insignificant factors through analysis of variance followed by examining the significant factors in face-centered central composite design. Reaction conversion in plug flow reactor was investigated, and experimental results after analysis were compared with batch reactor. The experimental data of both the reactors was fitted to develop second order model. Furthermore, graphical residual analysis was used to validate the model. The initial concentration of sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate for the hydrolysis reaction in both the reactors were reported to be the significant factors. The maximum conversion of 96% was achieved for a residence/reaction time of five minutes at optimum initial concentrations of sodium hydroxide (0.01mol/L) and ethyl acetate (0.07mol/L) in batch and plug flow reactor.  


Main Subjects

[1] Ruppen D., Benthack C., Bonvin D., Optimization of Batch Reactor Operation Under Parametric Uncertainty-Computational Aspects, J. Proc. Cont., 5(4), p. 235 (1995).
[2] Rajkumar R., Hinduja S., Roberto T., Recent Advances in Engineering Design Optimization: Challenges and Future Trends, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 57, p. 697 (2008).
[3] Asprey S.P., Macchietto S., Statistical Tools for Optimal Dynamic Model Building, Comput. Chem. Eng., 24, p. 1261 (2000).
[4] Montgomery D.C., "Design and Analysis of Experiments", 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2000).
[5] Zivorad R.L.,"Design of Experiments in Chemical Engineering",x WILEY-VCH, Weinheim (2004).
[6] Franceschini G., Macchietto S., Model-Based Design of Experiments for Parameter Precision: State of the Art., Chem. Eng. Sci., 63, p. 4846 (2008)
[8] Keyvanloo K.,Towghi J., Sadrameli S.M., Mohamadalizadeh A., Investigating the Effect of Key Factors, Their Interactions and Optimization of Naphtha Steam Cracking by Statistical Design of Experiments, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 87, p. 224 (2010).
[9] Othman N., Kamarudin S.K., Md-Yunus M.N., Shamsuddin A.H., Rozaimah R., Yaakob Z., Production of Carbon Dioxide Using Direct Pyrolysis Combustion from Aquilariella malaccensis or Karas Woods Under Argon Atmosphere, Pertanika J. Sci. Technol., 17(2), p. 355 (2009).
[10] Ling W.S., Tye Ching Thian T.C., Bhatia S., Process Optimization Studies for the Dehydration of Alcohol-Water System by Inorganic Membrane Based Pervaporation Separation Using Design of Experiments (DoE), Separation and Purification Technology, 71, p. 192 (2010).
[11] Yang Y-k., Chuang M-T., Lin S-S., Optimization of Dry Machining Parameters for High-Purity Graphite in End Milling Process via Design of Experiments Methods, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 209, p. 4395 (2009).
[13] Bursali N., Ertunc S., Akay B., Process Improvement Approach to the Saponification Reaction by Using Statistical Experimental Design, Chem. Engg. Process., 45, p. 980 (2006).
[15] Atkinson A.C., Bogacka B., Bogacki M.B., D- and T-Optimum Designs for the Kinetics of a Reversible Chemical Reaction, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 43, p. 185 (1998).
[16] Tsujikawa H.,Inoue H., The Reaction Rate of Aalkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 39(9), p. 1837 (1966).
[17] Mata-Segreda J. F., Hydroxide as General Base in the Saponification of Ethyl Acetate, J. Am. Chem.Soc., 124(10), p. 2259 (2002).
[18] Yusup S., Yusof V., Ku-hilmy K.E.S, Modelling and Simulation of a Plug Flow Reactor for Liquid Phase Methanol Synthesis, Extractedhttp://www.wseas.us/e-library/ conferences/ 2005athens/ eeesd/papers/505-330.doc (2005).
[19] Alopaeus V.,Laavi H., Aittamaa J., A Dynamic Model for Plug Flow Reactor State Profiles, Comput. Chem. Eng., 32, 1494 (2008).
[21] Balland L., Estel L., Cosmao J.M., Mouhab N., A Genetic Algorithm with Decimal Coding for the Estimation of Kinetic and Energetic Parameters,Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 50, p. 121 (2000).
[22] Grau M.D., Nougués J.M., Puigjaner L., Comparative Study of Two Chemical Reactions with Different Behaviour in Batch and Semi Batch Reactors, Chem. Eng. J., 88, p. 225 (2002).
[23] Krupska A., Konarski J., Fiedorow R., Adamiec J., Determination of the Rate Constants from Phase Delay Effect in Chemical Reactions, Kinet. Catal., 43 (3), p. 295 (2002).
[25] Sundberg D.C., Carleson T.E., Mccollister R.D., Experiments in Undergraduate Reaction Engineering: Startup and Transient Response of CSTR's in Series, Chemical Engineering Education, p. 118 (1977).
 [26] NIST/SEMATECH, "e- Hand Book of Statistical Methods",http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/, dated 23/12/2010.