The Effect of Bubble Surface Area Flux on Flotation Efficiency of Pyrite Particles

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, I.R. IRAN

2 Mining Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, I.R. IRAN

3 Mining Engineering Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, I.R. IRAN

4 Mining Engineering Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, I.R. IRAN

Abstract

In this research, the effect of bubble surface area flux, Sb, and particle size on flotation rate constant, k, of pyrite (FeS2) particles was studied using bubble-particle interactions. The bubble-particle collision, attachment and detachment efficiencies were calculated under different flow regimes. The k increased with increase in the collision efficiency and decrease in the detachment efficiency. Also the bubble-particle collection efficiency increased with increase in the Sb. Thus difficulty in the floating of fine particles was attributed to low efficiency of the bubble-particle collision efficiency while difficulty in the floating of coarse particles was due to high efficiency of bubble-particle detachment.  Maximum collision, attachment and detachment efficiencies were obtained as 81.57%, 50.60% and 51.89%, respectively.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Nguyen A.V., Evans G.M., Attachment Interaction between Air Bubbles and Particles in Froth Flotation, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 28, p. 381 (2004).
[2] Trahar W.J., The Selective Flotation of Galena from Sphalerite with Special Reference to the Effects of Particle Size, Int. J. Miner. Process, 3, p. 151 (1976).
[3] Shahbazi B., Rezai B., The Effect of Type and Dosage of Frothers on Coarse Particles Flotation, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 28(1), p. 95 (2009).
[4] Anthony R.M., Kelsall D.F., Trahar W.J., The Effect of Particle Size on the Activation and Flotation of Sphalerite, Proceedings of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 254, p. 47 (1975).
[5] Trahar W.J., A Rational Interpretation of the Role of Particle Size in Flotation, Int. J. Miner. Process, 8, p. 289 (1981).
[6] Shahbazi B., Rezai B., Koleini S.M.J., Effect of Dimensionless Hydrodynamic Parameters on Coarse Particles Flotation, Asian. J. Chem, 3, p. 2180 (2008).
[7] Shahbazi B., Rezai B., Koleini S.M.J., The Effect of Hydrodynamic Parameters on Probability of Bubble-Particle Collision and Attachment, Miner. Eng, 22, p. 57 (2009).
[8] Shahbazi B., Rezai B., Koleini S.M.J., Bubble-Particle Collision and Attachment Probability on Fine Particles Flotation, Bubble-Particle Collision and Attachment Probability on Fne Particles Flotation, Chem. Eng. Process, 49, p. 622 (2010).
[9] Chehreh Chelgani S., Shahbazi B., Rezai B., Estimation of Froth Flotation Recovery and Collision Probability Based on Operational Parameters Using an Artificial Neural Network, Int. J. Min. Met. Mater, 17, p. 526 (2010).
[10] Shaban E. Ghazy, Ahmed H. Ragab, Removal of Lead Ions from Aqueous Solution by Sorptive-Flotation Using Limestone and Oleic Acid,Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 26(4), p. 83 (2007).
[11] Spedden H.R., Hannan W.S., Attachment of Mineral Particles to Air Bubbles in Flotation, Min. Tech, 12, p. 2354 (1984).
[12] Whelan P.F., Brown D.S., Particle-Bubble Attachment in Froth Flotation, Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 65, p. 181 (1956).
[13] Pérez-Garibay R., Martínez-Ramos E., Rubio J., Gas Dispersion Measurements in Microbubble Flotation Systems, Miner Eng, in press (2011).
[14] Gorain B.K., Franzidis J.P., Manlapig E.V., Studies on Impeller Type, Impeller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 2: Effect on Gas Holdup, Miner. Eng, 8, p. 1557 (1995b).
[15] Gorain B.K., Franzidis J.P., Manlapig E.V., Studies on Impeller Type, Impeller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 3: Effect on Superficial Gas Velocity, Miner. Eng, 9, p. 639 (1996).
[16] Gorain B.K., Franzidis J.P., Manlapig E.V.,The Effect of Gas Dispersion Properties on the Kinetics of Flotation. Column 96, "35th Annual Conference of Metallurgists", CIM, Montreal, Canada, 299-313 (1996b).
[17] Gorain B.K., Franzidis J.P., Manlapig E.V., Studies on Impeller Type, Impeller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 4: Effect of Bubble Surface Area Flux on Flotation Kinetics, Miner. Eng, 10, p. 367 (1997).
[18] Gorain B.K., Franzidis J.P., Manlapig E.V., Studies on Impeller Type, Impeller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 5: Validation of k-Sb Relationship and Effect of Froth Depth, Miner. Eng, 11, p. 615 (1998).
[19] Hernandez-Aguilar J.R., Rao S.R., Finch J.A., Testing the k-Sb Relationship at the Microscale, Miner. Eng, 18, p. 591 (2005).
[20] Girgin E.H., Do S., Gomez C.O., Finch J.A., Bubble Size as a Function of Impeller Speed in a Self-Aeration Laboratory Flotation Cell, Miner. Eng, 19, p. 201 (2006).
[21] Jameson G.J., Nam S., Young M.M., Physical Factors Affecting Recovery Rates in Flotation, Min. Sci. Eng, 9, p. 103 (1977).
[22] Schulze H.J., Hydrodynamics of Bubble-Mineral Particle Collisions, Min. Process. Extractive. Metall, 5, p. 43 (1989).
[23] Flint L.R., Howarth W.J., The Collision Efficiency of Small Particles with Spherical Air Bubbles, Chem. Eng. Sci, 26, p. 1155 (1971).
[24] Yoon R.H., The Role of Hydrodynamic and Surface Forces in Bubble-Particle Interaction, Int. J. Miner. Process, 58, p. 129 (2000).
[25] Saffman P.G., Turner T.S., On the Collision of Drops in Turbulent Clouds, J Fluid Mech, 1, p. 16 (1956).
[26] Nguyen, A.V., Ralston, J., Schulze, H.J., On Modeling of Bubble-Particle Attachment Probability in Flotation, Miner Eng, 53, p. 225 (1998).
[27] Bloom F., Heindel T.J., Modeling Flotation Separation in a Semibatch Process, Chem Eng Sci, 58, p. 353 (2003).
[28] Mika T.S., Fuerstenau D.W., A Microscopic Model of the Flotation Process, "Eighth Int J Miner Process Congress", Leningrad, p. 246 (1968).
[29] Rodrigues R.T., Rubio J., New Basis for Measuring the Size Distribution of Bubbles, Miner Eng., 16, p. 757 (2003).