Operational Cost Analysis for the Treatment of Various Textile Effluents by Electrochemical Process Using Stainless Steel and Aluminum Electrodes

Document Type: Research Article


Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Chemistry, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai-638060, Tamil Nadu, INDIA


The development of treatment processes from laboratory scale to industries involves a lot of troubles due to the automation of process parameters and fluctuated characteristics of wastewater. In the present study, six different real-time textile effluents of samples such as S1 to S6 are characterized and treated by electrocoagulation process using Stainless Steel (SS) and Aluminum (Al) electrodes. The maximum removal efficiencies of color as 94%, turbidity as 99%, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) as 84% and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) as 82% is obtained for effluent sample S1 with fixed operational conditions such as the applied voltage of 4V, inter-electrode distance of 3 cm, the surface area of the electrode of 25 cm2 and agitation speed of 500 rpm respectively. After the electrocoagulation process, the BOD5/COD ratio of all effluent samples is observed as biodegradable limits. Under the fixed conditions, the operational cost for the treatment of effluent sample S1 analyzed as 2.42 and 1.01 $/m3 by using SS and Al electrodes respectively.


Main Subjects

[1] Khurana M.N.,  Indian Textile and Garment Industry- A Prospective Area for Investment in IndiaIndian Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3 (2017).

[2] Imtiazuddin S., Mumtaz M., Mallick K.A., Pollutants of Wastewater Characteristics in Textile IndustriesJournal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 8: 554-556, (2012).

[3] Bisschops I., Spanjers H., Literature Review on Textile Wastewater Characterisation, Environ. Technol., 24: 1399-1411 (2003).

[4] Wang Z., Xue M., Huang K., Liu Z., Textile Dyeing Wastewater Treatment, InTech (2011).

[5] Ghosh G., “Water of India:(Quality and Quantity)”, APH Publishing (2002).

[6] Ahmad A., Hameed B., Effect of Preparation Conditions of Activated Carbon from Bamboo Waste for Real Textile Wastewater, J. Hazard. Mater., 173: 487-493 (2010).

[7] Alinsafi A., Evenou F., Abdulkarim E., Pons M.-N., Zahraa O., Benhammou A., Yaacoubi A., Nejmeddine A., Treatment of Textile Industry Wastewater by Supported Photocatalysis, Dyes Pigm., 74: 439-445 (2007).

[9] Karthikeyan S., Titus A., Gnanamani A., Mandal A., Sekaran G., Treatment of Textile Wastewater by Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation Processes, Desalination, 281: 438-445 (2011).

[10] Badia-Fabregat M., Lucas D., Tuomivirta T., Fritze H., Pennanen T., Rodriguez-Mozaz S., Barcelo D., Caminal G., Vicent T., Study of the Effect of the Bacterial and Fungal Communities Present in Real Wastewater Effluents on the Performance of Fungal Treatments, Sci. Total Environ., 579: 366-377 (2017).

[12] Kobya M., Can O.T., Bayramoglu M., Treatment of Textile Wastewaters by Electrocoagulation Using Iron and Aluminum Electrodes, J. Hazard. Mater., 100: 163-178 (2003).

[13] Singh S., Srivastava V.C., Mall I.D., Electrochemical Treatment of Dye Bearing Effluent with Different Anode–Cathode Combinations: Mechanistic Study and Sludge Analysis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53: 10743-10752 (2014).

[14] Sakthisharmila P., Palanisamy P.N., Manikandan P. Removal of Benzidine Based Textile Dye Using Different Metal Hydroxides Generated in Situ Electrochemical Treatment-A Comparative Study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 2206-2215 (2018).

[15] Sakthisharmila P., Palanisamy P.N., Manikandan P. A Characteristic Study on Generation and Interactive Effect of Electrocoagulated Floc with Direct Green 1 and Reactive Red 2., Journal of Molecular Liquids, 231: 160-167 (2017).

[17] Zodi S., Merzouk B., Potier O., Lapicque F., Leclerc J.-P., Direct Red 81 Dye Removal by a Continuous Flow Electrocoagulation/Flotation Reactor, Sep. Purif. Technol., 108: 215-222 (2013).

[18] Bayar S., Yildiz Y., Yilmaz A., Koparal A.S., The Effect of Initial pH on Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Method, Desalin. Water Treat., 52: 3047-3053 (2014).

[19] Kobya M., Demirbas E., Can O.T., Bayramoglu M., Treatment of Levafix Orange Textile Dye Solution by Electrocoagulation, J. Hazard. Mater., 132: 183-188 (2006).

[20] Kobya M., Gengec E., Demirbas E., Operating Parameters and Costs Assessments of a Real Dyehouse Wastewater Effluent Treated by a Continuous Electrocoagulation Process, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensification, 101: 87-100 (2016).

[21] Yazdanbakhsh A.R., Massoudinegad M.R., Eliasi S., Mohammadi A.S., The Influence of Operational Parameters on Reduce of Azithromyin COD from Wastewater Using the Peroxi-Electrocoagulation Process, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 6: 51-57 (2015).

[23] Geraldino H.C.L., Simionato J.I., de Souza Freitas T.K.F., Garcia J.C., de Carvalho Júnior O.,& Correr C.J., Efficiency and Operating Cost of Electrocoagulation System Applied to the Treatment of Dairy Industry Wastewater. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 37(3): 401-408 (2015).

[24] Varank G., Erkan H., Yazýcý S., Demir A., Engin G., Electrocoagulation of Tannery Wastewater Using Monopolar Electrodes: Process Optimization by Response Surface Methodology, International Journal of Environmental Research, 8(1): 165-180 (2014).

[25] Kobya M., Gengec E., Demirbas E., Operating Parameters and Costs Assessments of a Real Dyehouse Wastewater Effluent Treated by a Continuous Electrocoagulation Process, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 101: 87-100 (2016).

[26] Kobya M., Bayramoglu M., Eyvaz M., Techno-Economical Evaluation of Electrocoagulation for the Textile Wastewater Using Different Electrode Connections. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 148(1-2): 311-318 (2007).

[27] Hashim K.S., Shaw A., Al Khaddar R., Pedrola M.O., Phipps D., Iron Removal, Energy Consumption and Operating Cost of Electrocoagulation of Drinking Water Using a New Flow Column Reactor, Journal of Environmental Management, 189: 98-108 (2017a).

[28] Hashim K.S., Shaw A., Al Khaddar R., Pedrola M.O., Phipps D., Energy Efficient Electrocoagulation Using a New Flow Column Reactor to Remove Nitrate from Drinking Water–Experimental, Statistical, and Economic Approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 196: 224-233 (2017).

[29] Hashim K.S., Shaw A., Al Khaddar R., Pedrola M.O., Phipps D., Defluoridation of Drinking Water Using a New Flow Column-Electrocoagulation Reactor (FCER)-Experimental, Statistical, and Economic Approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 197: 80-88 (2017).

[30] Vidal J., Espinoza C., Contreras N., Salazar R., Elimination of Industrial Textile Dye by Electrocoagulation Using Iron Electrodes, Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society, 62(2): 3519-3524 (2017).

[31] Chafi M., Gourich B., Essadki A.H., Vial C., Fabregat A., Comparison of Electrocoagulation Using Iron and Aluminium Electrodes with Chemical Coagulation for the Removal of a Highly Soluble Acid Dye, Desalination, 281: 285-292, (2011).

[32] Kobya M., Hiz H., Senturk E., Aydiner C., Demirbas E., Treatment of Potato Chips Manufacturing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation, Desalination, 190(1-3): 201-211 (2006).