Sensitivity Analysis of Coal and Bagasse Co-Firing in an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant

Abid, Laraib; Khan, Saad Saeed; Ghani, Usman; Mahmood, Awais; Gheewala, Shabbir H.

doi:10.30492/ijcce.2022.534073.4834

Sensitivity Analysis of Coal and Bagasse Co-Firing in an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

¹ Department of Chemical Engineering, NFC Institute of Engineering & Technology, Khanewal Rd., Multan, PAKISTAN

² The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, THAILAND

³ Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok, THAILAND

10.30492/ijcce.2022.534073.4834

Abstract

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plants generate electricity by utilizing the syngas obtained from the carbonaceous materials via gasification. These systems commonly use coal fuel; however, biomass fuels like bagasse could be a more environmentally friendly option. This study was aimed at analyzing the effects of varying operating parameters (such as temperature, pressure, O₂/fuel, and water/fuel ratios), and fuel feedstocks (i.e., coal, bagasse, and coal-bagasse co-firing) on the syngas composition. Based on the data obtained from a commercial power plant, an equilibrium model was developed and validated using the Aspen Plus^®software. Sensitivity analysis was carried out by varying the considered operating parameters and selected fuel feedstocks. The results of this study have manifested that low temperatures, low O₂/fuel ratio, and high water/fuel ratio produce syngas with a comparatively higher H₂/CO ratio. The highest H₂/CO ratios of 1.16, 0.99, and 0.84, were obtained for bagasse, co-firing, and coal, respectively at operating parameters of 1200°C temperature, 0.5 O₂/fuel, and 0.6 water/fuel ratios. Furthermore, bagasse and co-firing of coal-bagasse feedstocks could provide a better quality of syngas as compared to that of coal feedstock. The results of this study would also help to operate the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle plants at optimum performance by utilizing different fuels and by appropriately adjusting the operating parameters.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Energy, Heat Transfer

References

[1] Higman C., "Gasification", Combustion Engineering Issues for Solid Fuel Systems. Elsevier, Inc., 423–468 (2008).

[2] Henriksen U., Ahrenfeldt J., Jensen T.K., Gøbel B., Bentzen J.D., Hindsgaul C., Sørensen L.H., The Design, Construction, and Operation of a 75kW Two-Stage Gasifier, Energy, 31(10–11): 1542–1553 (2006).

[3] Sharma M., Kaushal R., Gasification of Walnut Shells in an Open Core Downdraft Gasifier for the Producer Gas Generation, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 1–12 (2020).

[4] Zhang Y., Cui Y., Chen P., Liu S., Zhou N., Ding K., Fan L., Peng P., Min M., Cheng Y., Wang Y., Wan Y., Liu Y., Li B., Ruan R., "Gasification Technologies and Their Energy Potentials". Sustainable Resource Recovery and Zero Waste Approaches. Elsevier, Inc., 193–206 (2019).

[5] Xia C., Ye B., Jiang J., Shu Y., Prospect of Near-Zero-Emission IGCC Power Plants to Decarbonize Coal-Fired Power Generation in China: Implications from the GreenGen project, Journal of Cleaner Production, 271: 122615 (2020).

[6] Al Lagtah N.M.A., Onaizi S.A., Albadarin A.B., Ghaith F.A., Nour M.I., Techno-Economic Analysis of the Effects of Heat Integration and Different Carbon Capture Technologies on the Performance of Coal-based IGCC Power Plants, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7(6): 103471 (2019).

[7] Lopes E.J., Okamura L.A., Yamamoto C.I., Formation of Dioxins and Furans during Municipal Solid Waste Gasification, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 32(1): 87–97 (2015).

[8] Hussain I., Jalil A.A., Mamat C.R., Siang T.J., Rahman A.F.A., Azami M.S., Adnan R.H., New Insights on the Effect of the H₂/CO Ratio for Enhancement of CO Methanation over Metal-Free Fibrous Silica ZSM-5: Thermodynamic and Mechanistic Studies, Energy Conversion and Management, 199: 112056 (2019).

[9] Carpio L.G.T., Simone de Souza F., Optimal Allocation of Sugarcane Bagasse for Producing Bioelectricity and Second Generation Ethanol in Brazil: Scenarios of Cost Reductions, Renewable Energy, 111: 771–780 (2017).

[10] Arshad M., Ahmed S., Cogeneration through Bagasse: A Renewable Strategy to Meet the Future Energy Needs, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 732–737 (2016).

[11] Rodrigues R., Muniz A.R., Marcilio N.R., Evaluation of Biomass and Coal Co – Gasification of Brazilian Feedstock using a Chemical Equilibrium Model, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 33(2): 401–414 (2016).

[12] Amezcua-Allieri M.A., Martínez-Hernández E., Anaya-Reza O., Magdaleno-Molina M., Melgarejo-Flores L.A., Palmerín-Ruiz M.E., Eguía-Lis J.A.Z., Rosas-Molina A., Enríquez-Poy M., Aburto J., Techno-Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Energy Generation from Sugarcane Bagasse: Case Study for a Sugar Mill in Mexico, Food and Bioproducts Processing, 118: 281–292 (2019).

[13] Mallick D., Mahanta P., Moholkar V.S., Co-Gasification of Coal and Biomass Blends: Chemistry and Engineering, Fuel, 204: 106–128 (2017).

[14] Truong A.H., Patrizio P., Leduc S., Kraxner F., Ha-Duong M., Reducing Emissions of the Fast Growing Vietnamese Coal Sector: The Chances Offered by Biomass Co-Firing, Journal of Cleaner Production, 215: 1301–1311 (2019).

[15] Restrepo Á., Bazzo E., Co-firing: An Exergoenvironmental Analysis Applied to Power Plants Modified for Burning Coal and Rice Straw, Renewable Energy, 91: 107–119 (2016).

[16] Chen C., Qin S., Chen F., Lu Z., Cheng Z., Co-Combustion Characteristics Study of Bagasse, Coal and Their Blends by Thermogravimetric Analysis, Journal of the Energy Institute, 92(2): 364-369 (2019).

[17] Lei Y., Zhou R., Process Simulation of Biomass Gasification with Steam as Gasification Agent, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 1-7 (2019).

[18] Akhlas J., Ruggeri F., Bertucco A., Simulation of Steam Gasification of Coal with Pre-Combustion enabling Cleaner Coal Conversion, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 43: 2017–2022 (2015).

[19] Saha P., Helal Uddin M., Toufiq Reza M., A Steady-State Equilibrium-based Carbon Dioxide Gasification Simulation Model for Hydrothermally Carbonized Cow Manure, Energy Conversion and Management, 191: 12–22 (2019).

[20] Uddin F., Taqvi S.A., Memon I., Process Simulation and Sensitivity Analysis of Indirect Coal Gasification using Aspen Plus Model, ARPN Journal of Engineering & Applied Sciences, 11(17): 10546–10552 (2016).

[21] Acar M.C., Böke Y.E., Simulation of Biomass Gasification in a BFBG using Chemical Equilibrium Model and Restricted Chemical Equilibrium Method, Biomass and Bioenergy, 125: 131–138 (2019).

[22] Shi B., Xu W., Wu W., Kuo P.C., Techno-Economic Analysis of Oxy-Fuel IGCC Power Plants using Integrated Intermittent Chemical Looping Air Separation, Energy Conversion and Management, 195: 290–301 (2019).

[23] Tupsakhare S., Dooher J., Modroukas D., Castaldi M., Improved Gasification Efficiency in IGCC Plants & Viscosity Reduction of Liquid Fuels and Solid Fuel Dispersion using Liquid and Gaseous CO₂, Fuel, 256: 115848 (2019).

[24] Niu M., Xie J., Liang S., Liu L., Wang L., Peng Y., Simulation of a New Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) Power Generation System using Aspen Plus: Performance Analysis and Energetic Assessment, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(43): 22356–22367 (2021).

[25] Ge H., Zhang H., Guo W., Song T., Shen L., System simulation and Experimental Verification: Biomass-based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) Coupling with Chemical Looping Gasification (CLG) for Power Generation, Fuel, 241: 118–128 (2019).

[26] Ahmed U., Zahid U., Lee Y., Process Simulation and Integration of IGCC Systems for H₂/Syngas/Electricity Generation with Control on CO₂ Emissions, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(14): 7137–7148 (2019).

[27] Parvez M., Khan O., Parametric Simulation of Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) Power Plant using Three Different Biomass Materials, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 10(4): 803–812 (2020).

[28] Darabi M., Mohammadiun M., Mohammadiun H., Mortazavi S., Montazeri M., Simulation and Optimization Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle by used Aspen Hysys and Aspen Plus, International Journal of Scientific World, 3(1): 178–186 (2015).

[29] S. Hussain K. Shahzad K.S. Akthar N.A. Akhthar A.C., Investigations of Thermal Conversion and Kinetics of Low-Grade Coal and Bagasse Using Thermogravimetric Technique, Journal of Faculty of Engineering & Technology, 21(2): 105–117 (2014).

[30] Hussain M., Tufa L.D., Yusup S., Zabiri H., A Kinetic-based Simulation Model of Palm Kernel Shell Steam Gasification in a Circulating Fluidized Bed using Aspen Plus^®: A Case Study, Biofuels, 9(5): 635–646 (2018).

[31] Domenico M.D., Amorim S.M., Collazzo G.C., José H.J., Moreira R.F.P.M., Coal Gasification in the Presence of Lithium Orthosilicate. Part 1: Reaction Kinetics, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 141: 529–539 (2019).

[32] Saeed S., Shafeeq A., Raza W., Ijaz A., Saeed S., Thermal Performance Analysis of Ionic Liquid‐Pretreated Spent Coffee Ground Using Aspen Plus^®, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 43(12): 2447–2456 (2020).

[33] Bermudez J.M., Fidalgo B., "Production of Bio-Syngas and Bio-Hydrogen via Gasification". "Handbook of Biofuels Production" (Second Edition). Elsevier, Inc., 43–494 (2016).

[34] Żogała A., Equilibrium Simulations of Coal Gasification-Factors Affecting Syngas Composition, Journal of Sustainable Mining, 13(2): 30–38 (2014).