Quantitative Safety and Health Assessment Based on Fuzzy Inference and AHP at Preliminary Design Stage

Document Type: Research Article

Authors

1 Teachers College ,Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071,Shandong,CHINA

2 The Hi-Tech Institute for Petroleum and Chemical Industry, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042,Shandong,CHINA

Abstract

Quantitative assessment is the most important means to identify hazard potential and manage risk for an industrial process. The implement of quantitative assessment in the early stage will help to develop inherently safer process, eliminating the hazard and reduce the possibility of accidental chain events and the magnitude of consequences. In this paper, after reviewing the presently available assessment method, we present the disadvantages of current technology in several aspects. Focusing on the main disadvantage of subjectivity in two aspects of index valuing and weighting, which is a serious barrier to measure the real level of process safety, we propose a quantitative assessment method integrated fuzzy inference and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) to quantify safety and health hazards of chemical process route in preliminary design stage. The purpose of integrating fuzzy inference into it is to reduce the subjectivity of index valuing system. The fuzzy inference system is designed without medium variable in order to eliminate its negative effect on assessment result. Index weighting is determined by AHP more objectively based on the ordering of inherent safety guidewords. Finally, the proposed method is applied to assessment nine competing routes of acetic acid manufacture to present its improvement.

Keywords


[1] Srinivasan R., Natarajan S., Developments in Inherent Safety: A Review of the Progress During 2001–2011 and Opportunities Ahead, Process Saf. Environ., 90(5): 389-403 (2012).

[4] Rathnayaka S., Khan F., Amyotte P., Risk-Based Process Plant Design Considering Inherent Safety, Safety Science, 70:438-464 (2014).

[5] Gupta J.P., Edwards D.W., Inherently Safer Design-Present and Future, Process Saf. Environ., 80(3): 115-125 (2002).

[6] Heikkila A.M., Safety Considerations in Process Synthesis, Comput. Chem. Eng., 20(1):115-120 (1996).

[7] Heikkila A.M., Inherent Safety in Process Plant Design, an Index-based Approach, PhD Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, (1999).

[8] Palaniappan C., Srinivasan R., Tan R., Expert System for the Design of Inherently Safer Processes. 1. Route Selection Stage, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(26): 6698-6710 (2002).

[9] Palaniappan C., Srinivasan R., Tan R., Selection of Inherently Safer Process Routes: A Case Study, Chem. Eng. Process., 43(5): 641-647 (2004).

[10] Gentile M., Rogers W.J., Mannan M.S., Development of a Fuzzy Logic-Based Inherent Safety Index, Process. Saf. Environ., 81(6):444-456 (2003).

[11] Gentile M., Williams J.R., Mannan S., Development of an Inherent Safety Index Based on Fuzzy Logic, AIChE J., 49(4): 959-968 (2003).

[12] Gentile M., Development of a Hierarchical Fuzzy Model for the Evaluation of Inherent Safety, Texas A&M University, Texas, (2004).

[13] Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R., Integrated Inherent Safety Index(I2SI): A Tool for Inherent Safety Evaluation, Process Saf. Prog., 23(2): 136-148 (2004).

[14] Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R., I2SI: A Comprehensive Quantitative Tool for Inherent Safety and Cost Evaluation, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 18(4):310-326 (2005).

[15] Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R., Inherent Safety in Offshore Oil and Gas Activities: a Review of the Present Status and Future Directions, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 15(4):279-289 (2002).

[16] Koller G., Fischer U., Hungerbuler K., Assessing Safety, Health, and Environmental Impact Early During Process Development, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(4):960-972 (2000).

[17] Gupta J.P., Edwards D.W., A Simple Graphical Method for Measuring of Inherent Safety, J. Hazard. Mater., 104(1):15-30 (2003).

[18] Srinivasan R., Nhan N.T., A Statistical Approach for Evaluating Inherent Benign-Ness of Chemical Process Routes in Early Design Stages, Process. Saf. Environ., 86(3):163-174 (2008).

[19] Leong C.T., Shariff A.M., Process Route Index (PRI) to Assess Level of Explosiveness for Inherent Safety Quantification, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 22(2): 216-221 (2009).

[20] Shariff A.M., Leong C.T., Inherent Risk Assessment-A New Concept to Evaluate Risk in Preliminary Design Stage, Process. Saf. Environ., 87(6): 371-376 (2009).

[21] Rahman M., Heikkila A.M., Hurme M., Comparison of Inherent Safety Indices in Process Concept Evaluation, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 18(4): 327-334 (2005).

[22] Hassim M.H., Hurme M., Edwards D.W., Aziz N.N.N.A., Rahim F.L.M., Simple Graphical Method for Inherent Occupational Health Assessment. Process. Saf. Environ., 91(6): 438-451 (2013).

[23] Shariff A.M., Leong C.T., Zaini D., Using Process Stream Index (PSI) to Assess Inherent Safety Level During Preliminary Design Stage, Safety Science, 50(4):1098-1103 (2012).

[24] Crawley F.K., Optimizing the Life Cycle Safety, Health and Environment Impact of New Projects, Process. Saf. Environ., 82(6):438-445 (2004).

[25] Shariff, A.M., Zaini D., Inherent Risk Assessment Methodology in Preliminary Design Stage: A Case Study for Toxic Release, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 26(4):605-613 (2013).

[26] Hassim M.H., Edwards D.W., Development of a Methodology for Assessing Inherent Occupational Health Hazards, Process. Saf. Environ., 84(5): 378-390 (2006).

[27] Cave S.R., Edwards D.W., Chemical Process Route Selection Based on Assessment of Inherent Environmental Hazard, Comput. Chem. Eng., 21(9): 965-980 (1997).

[28] Hassim M.H., Hurme M., Markku H., Inherent Occupational Health Assessment During Basic Engineering Stage, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 23(2):2 60-268 (2010).

[29] Hassim M.H., Hurme M., Markku H., Inherent Occupational Health Assessment During Process Research and Development Stage, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 23(1):127-138 (2010).

[30] Liu S.H., Shu C.M., Hou H.Y., Applications of Thermal Hazard Analyses on Process Safety Assessments, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 33:59-69 (2015).

[31] Shariff M.A., Rusli R., Leong C.T., Radhakrishnan V.R., Buang A., Inherent Safety Tool for Explosion Consequences Study, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 19(5): 409-418 (2006).

[32] Leong C.T., Shariff M.A., Inherent Safety Index Module(ISIM) to Assess Inherent Safety Level During Preliminary Design Stage, Process. Saf. Environ., 86(2):113-119 (2008).

[33] Risza R., Shariff M.A., Qualitative Assessment for Inherently Safer Design (QAISD) at Preliminary Design Stage, J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 23(1):157-165 (2010).

[34] Ahmad, S.A., Hashim H., Hassim M.H., Numerical Descriptive Inherent Safety Technique (NuDIST) for Inherent Safety Assessment in Petrochemical Industry, Process. Saf. Environ., 92(5):379-389 (2014).

[35] Daniel A.C., Robert E.B., David G.C., Inherently Safer Chemical Processes-a Life Cycle Approach, Second Edition, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, (2010).

[36] Rusli R., Shariff, A.M., Khan F.I., Evaluating Hazard Conflicts Using Inherently Safer Design Concept, Safety Science, 53:61-72 (2013).