CFD Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Flow in Pneumatic Conveying of Wheat

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Chemical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, I.R. IRAN

Abstract

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of gas-solid flow through a positive low-pressure pneumatic conveyor were performed using Eulerian-Eulerian framework. Pressure drop in pneumatic conveying pipelines, creation and destruction of plugs along the horizontal and vertical pipes, effect of 90° elbows and U-bends on cross-section concentrations, and rope formation and dispersion were numerically investigated for the wheat particles at ten different operating conditions. The effects of air inlet velocity and the conveying capacity on the flow behavior were also discussed. Both parameters played a significant role in the conveying flow pattern and also the pressure drop. The numerical simulations validated against the experimental data from literature and also qualitatively compared with trends in experimental data. Excellent quantitative agreement between experimental and simulated results (±1%) was observed in dense-phase conveying. For the dilute-phase conveying simulations underestimated the values of pressure drop by 20%; however, this still falls within the acceptable error ranges reported in the literature. This study stresses the capability of CFD to explain and predict the behavior of complex gas-solid conveying systems and to be used productively for investigations in pneumatic conveying of agricultural and pharmaceutical particles as an aid in the system design..

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Levy A. Two-Fluid Approach for Plug Flow Simulations in Horizontal Pneumatic Conveying. Powder Technology, 112(3): 263-272 (2000).
[2] Konrad K., Dense-Phase Pneumatic Conveying: A Review. Powder Technology, 49: 1-35 (1986).
[3] Mills D., Jones M. G., Agarwal V. K., “Handbook of Pneumatic Conveying Engineering”, Marcel Dekker (2004).
[4] Pan R., Material Properties and Flow Modes in Pneumatic Conveying. Powder Technology, 104(2): 157-163 (1999).
[5] Rhodes M., “Introduction to Particle Technology”, John Wiley (2008).
[6] Kleinstreuer C., “Two-Phase Flow: Theory and Applications”, Taylor & Francis, (2003).
[7] Snider D. M., O’Rourke P. J., “Gas-Solids Flows and Reacting Systems: Theory, Methods and Practice" (1st ed.), IGI Global (2010).
[8] Sakai M., Koshizuka S., Large-Scale Discrete Element Modeling in Pneumatic Conveying, Chemical Engineering Science, 64(3):533-539 (2008).
[9] Sakai M., Yamada Y., Shigeto Y., Shibata K., Kawasaki V.M., Koshizuka S., Large‐Scale Discrete Element Modeling in a Fluidized Bed, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 64(10‐12): 1319-1335 (2010).
[10] Güner M., Pneumatic Conveying Characteristics of Some Agricultural Seeds, Journal of Food Engineering, 80(3): 904-913 (2007).
[11] Pu W., Zhao C., Xiong Y., Liang C., Chen X., Lu P., Fan C., Numerical Simulation on Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying of Pulverized Coal in Horizontal Pipe at High Pressure, Chemical Engineering Science, 65(8): 2500-2512 (2010).
[12] Hidayat M., Rasmuson A., Some Aspects on Gas-Solid Flow in a U-Bend: Numerical Investigation. Powder Technology, 153(1):1-13 (2005).
[13] Huber N., Sommerfeld M., Characterization of the Cross-Sectional Particle Concentration Distribution in Pneumatic Conveying Systems, Powder Technology, 79(3):191-210 (1994).
[14] Levy A., Mason D. J., The Effect of a Bend on the Particle Cross-Section Concentration and Segregation 
in Pneumatic Conveying Systems, Powder Technology, 98(2): 95-103 (1998).
[15] Akilli H., Levy E.K., Sahin B., Gas-Solid Flow Behavior in a Horizontal Pipe After a 90° Vertical-To-Horizontal Elbow, Powder Technology, 116(1): 43-52 (2001).
[16] Yilmaz A., Levy E. K., Formation and Dispersion of Ropes in Pneumatic Conveying, Powder Technology, 114(1-3): 168-185 (2001).
[17] Kuan B., Yang W., Schwarz M.P., Dilute Gas-Solid Two-Phase Flows in a Curved 90° Duct Bend: CFD Simulation with Experimental Validation. Chemical Engineering Science, 62(7):2068-2088 (2007).
[18] McGlinchey D., Cowell A., Knight E. A., Pugh J. R., Mason A., Foster B., Bend Pressure Drop Predictions Using the Euler-Euler Model in Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying. Particulate Science and Technology, 25(6): 495-506 (2007).
[19] Chu K. W., Yu A.B., Numerical Simulation of Complex Particle-Fluid Flows, Powder Technology, 179(3): 104-114 (2008).
[20] El-Behery S.M., Hamed M.H., El-Kadi M.A., Ibrahim K.A., CFD Prediction of Air-Solid Flow in 180° Curved Duct, Powder Technology, 191(1-2): 130-142 (2009).
[21] Papadikis K., Gu, S., Fivga A., Bridgwater A.V., Numerical Comparison of the Drag Models of Granular Flows Applied to the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass, Energy Fuels, 24: 2133-2145 (2010).
[22] Sanchez L., Vasquez N. A., Klinzing G. E., Dhodapkar S., Evaluation of Models and Correlations for Pressure Drop Estimation in Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying and an Experimental Analysis, Powder Technology, 153(3): 142-147 (2005).
[23] Wypych P. W., Yi J., Minimum Transport Boundary for Horizontal Dense-Phase Pneumatic Conveying of Granular Materials, Powder Technology, 129(1-3): 111-121 (2003).
[24] Mallick S.S., Wypych P.W., Minimum Transport Boundaries for Pneumatic Conveying of Powders. Powder Technology, 194(3):181-186 (2009).
[25] Lee L.Y., Yong Quek T., Deng R., Ray, M.B., Wang C.-H., Pneumatic Transport of Granular Materials Through a 90° Bend, Chemical Engineering Science, 59(21):4637-4651 (2004).
[26] Tsuji Y., Morikawa Y., LDV Measurements of an Air-Solid Two-Phase Flow in a Horizontal Pipe, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 120: 385-409 (1982).
Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 4 - Serial Number 76
December 2015
Pages 123-140

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics