An Electrochemical Measurement for Evaluating the Cathodic Disbondment of Buried Pipeline Coatings under Cathodic Protection

Document Type: Research Article

Authors

1 Young Researchers and Elites Club, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRAN

2 Industrial Protection Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), P.O. Box 1485733111 Tehran, IRAN

3 Chemistry Department, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRAN

Abstract

Steel pipelines are susceptible to corrosion by the action of corrosive substance in the environment and one of the most common failure modes in buried pipeline coatingis cathodic disbondment. Consequently, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) was used to assess the effect of three important parameters, the thickness of coating, the artificial defect and electrolyte type, on cathodic disbondment, according to ASTM G8. Experiments were done in 3.5 % wt NaCl, KCl and CaCl2 solutions at room temperature with different coating thicknesses (354, 483 and 1014μm) and several artificial defects diameters (3, 6 and 9 mm). Immersion time was 28 days and during this period, a -1.5 V cathodic potential (vs. SCE) was applied. Further, the EIS measurements were done in Open Circuit Potential (OCP). Investigations showed that a thick polyurethane coating was highly resistant to cathodic disbondment in intact areas and that coating thickness increases caused decreases in the rate of cathodic disbondment in areas with defects. On the other hand, the evaluation on artificial defects showed disputable results, though with no logical correlations between artificial defects’ diameters and any disbonded area individually. In addition, assessment on electrolyte type showed the rate of cathodic disbonding might be classified after two parameters: solubility and mobility of ions. So, the disbonded area was dependent on the cation type in the electrolyte, and the anion diffusion had less effect in the cathodic disbondment process. Furthermore, the comparison between the cations and the anions in solution showed that the most important coating disbondments occurred when cations / anions are in a 1:1 ratio.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Norsworthy R, Understanding Corrosion in Underground Pipelines: Basic Principles, Underground Pipeline Corrosion J., 3-34 (2014)
[2] Guan S.W., %100 Solid Polyurethane and Polyurea coatings technology, Coatings World,  49-58 (2003).
[3] Yan M., Wang J., Han E., ke W., Local Environment under Simulated Disbonded Coating on Steel Pipelines in Soil Solution, 50: 1331-1339 (2008).
[4] Chen X., Li. X.G., Du C.W., Cheng Y.F., Effect of Cathodic Protection on Corrosion of Pipeline Steel under Disbonded Coating, Corrosion Science, 51: 2242-2245 (2009).
[5]  Fu A.Q., Cheng Y.F., Characterization of Corrosion of X65 Pipeline Steel under Disbonded Coating by Scanning Kelvin Probe, Corrosion Science, 51: 914-920 (2009).
[6] Luo J., Lin C., Yang Q., Guan S., Cathodic Disbonding of a Thick Polyurethane Coating from Steel in Sodium Chloride Solution, Progress in Organic Coatings, 31: 289-295 (1997).
[7]  Deflorian F., Rossi S., An EIS Study of Ion Diffusion Through Organic Coatings, Electrochimica Acta, 51: 1736-1744 (2006).
[8] Changjun C., Qiao P., Study on Hydrogen Permeation Process, 209: 1011-1015 (2003).
[9] Zhang J., Hu J., Cao C., Studies of Impedance Models and Water Transport Behaviors of Polypropylene Coated Metals in NaCl Solution, Progress in Organic Coatings, 49: 293-301 (2004).
[10] Neshati J., Rezaei F., Akbarinezhad E., Evaluation of Protection Against Corrosion of Thick Polyurethane Coating by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Surface Engineering, 24: 470-474 (2008).
[11] Luo J., Lin C., Yang Q., Guan S., Cathodic Disbonding of a Thick Polyurethane Coating from Steel in Sodium Chloride Solution, Progress in Organic Coatings, 31: 289-295 (1997).
[12] Watts J., Mechanistic Aspects of the Cathodic Delamination of Organic Coatings, The Journal of Adhesion, 31: 73-85 (1989).
[13] Flavio D., Stefano R., An EIS Study of Ion Diffusion Through Organic Coatings, Electrochimica Acta, 51: 1736-1744 (2006).
[14] Skar J., Steinsmo U., Cathodic Disbonding of Pain Films-Transport of Charge, Corrosion Science, 35: 1385-1389 (1993).
[15] Horner M., Boerio F., Cathodic Delamination of an Epoxy/Polyamide Coating from Steel, The Journal of Adhesion, 32: 141-156 (1990).
[16] Stratmann M., Leng A., Fürbeth W., Streckel H., Gehmecker H., The Scanning Kelvin Probe; A New Technique for the in Situ Analysis of the Delamination of Organic Coatings, Progress in Organic Coatings, 27: 261-267 (1996).
[17] Rohwerder M., Hornung E., Stratmann M., Microscopic Aspects of Electrochemical Delamination: an SKPFMStudy, Electrochimica Acta, 48: 1235-1243 (2003).
[18] Cheng Y.F., Niu L., Mechanism for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH Solution, Electrochemistry Communications, 9:  558-562 (2007).
[19] Parkins R.N., Uhlig’s Corrosion  Handbook, 2nd edition, Revie R.W. (Editor), Wiley, New York, 191-194 (2000)
[20] Niu L., Cheng Y., Corrosion Behavior of X-70 Pipe Steel in Near-Neutral pH Solution, Applied Surface Science, 253: 8626-8631 (2007).
[21] Cheng Y., Thermodynamically Modeling the Interactions of Hydrogen, Stress and anodic Dissolution at Crack-Tip During Near-Neutral pH SCC in Pipelines, Journal of Materials Science, 42: 2701-2705 (2007).
[22] Dong C., Fu A., Li X., Cheng Y., Localized EIS Characterization of Corrosion of Steel at Coating Defect under Cathodic Protection, Electrochimica Acta, 54: 628-633 (2008).
[23] Leidheiser H., The Mechanism for the Cathodic Delamination of Organic Coatings from a Metal Surface, Progress in Organic Coatings, 11: 19-40 (1983).
[24] Van Der Weijde D., Van Westing E., De Wit J., Electrochemical Techniques for Delamination Studies , Corrosion Science, 36: 643-652 (1994).
[25] Perdomo J., Song I., Chemical and Electrochemical Conditions on Steel Under Disbonded Coatings: the Effect of Applied Potential, Solution Resistivity, Crevice Thickness and Holiday Size, Corrosion Science, 42: 1389-1415 (2000).
[28] Jorcin J., Aragon E., Merlatti C., Pébère N., Delaminated Areas Beneath Organic Coating: A Local Electrochemical Impedance Approach, Corrosion Science, 48: 1779-1790 (2006).
[29] Mansfeld F., Use of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for the Study of Corrosion Protection by Polymer Coatings, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 25: 187-202 (1995).
[30] F. Mansfeld, Models for the Impedance Behavior of Protective Coatings and Cases of Localized Corrosion, Electrochimica Acta, 38: 1891-1897 (1993).
[31] Lee C., Mansfeld F., Automatic Classification of Polymer Coating Quality using Artificial Neural Networks, Corrosion Science, 41: 439-461 (1998).
[32] Alavi S.M., Mirmomen M., Experimental Study of Coating in a Bottom Sprayed Fluidized Bed, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. (IJCCE), 26: 37-44 (2007)
[33] Deflorian F., Rossi S., The Role of Ions Diffusion in the Cathodic Delamination Rate of Polyester Coated Phosphatized Steel, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 17: 291-306 (2003).
[34] Mahjani M., Neshati J., Masiha H., Ghanbarzadeh A., Jafarian M., Evaluation of Corrosion Behaviour of Organic Coatings with Electrochemical Noise and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Surface Engineering, 22: 229-234 (2006).
[35] Neshati J., Fardi M., Evaluation and Investigation of Surface Treatment of Industrial Coatings by Impedance Spectroscopy, Surface Engineering, 20: 299-303 (2004).
[36] Nguyen T., Martin J., Modes and Mechanisms for the Degradation of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy-Coated Steel in a Marine Concrete Environment, Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 1: 81-92 (2004).
[37] Eng A., PilgrimF., Patel M., "Mechanisms of Military Coatings Degradation", End of Fiscal Year Report (2000).
[38] Lee S.H., Oh W.K., Kim J.G., Acceleration and Quantitative Evaluation of Degradation for Corrosion Protective Coatings on Buried Pipeline: Part I. Development of Electrochemical Test Methods, Progress in Organic Coating, 76(4): 778-783 (2013).
[39] Afshari V., Dehghanian C., Electrochemical Polarization and Passivation of Nanostructured Iron in Acid Solution, Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials, 57: 142-147 (2010).
[40] Pistorius P., Burstein G., Aspects of the Effects of Electrolyte Composition on the Occurrence of Metastable Pitting on Stainless Steel, Corrosion Science, 36: 525-538 (1994).
[41] Ritter J., Rodriguez M., An Electrochemical and Sers Study, Corrosion Science, 38: 223-226 (1982).
[42] Atkinson J., Granata R., Leidheiser Jr H., McBride D., Cathodic Delamination Of Methyl Methacrylate-Based Dry Film Polymers On Copper, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 29: 27-36 (1985).
[43] McCafferty E., Hubler G., Natishan P., Moore P., Kant R., Sartwell B., Materials Science and Engineering, 86: 1-17 (1987).
[44] McCafferty E., Thermodynamic Aspects of the Crevice Corrosion of Iron in Chromate/Chloride Solutions, Corrosion Science, 29: 391-401 (1989).
[45] Chuang T., Nguyen T., Lee S., Micro-Mechanic Model for Cathodic Blister Growth in Painted Steel, Journal of Coatings Technology, 71: 75-85 (1999).
[46] "Steel Tubes and Fitting for Onshore and Offshore Pipelines-External Applied Liquid Polyurethane and Polyurethane Modified Coatings", BS EN 10290, London, UK (2002).
[47] "Recent Corrosion Protective Steel Pipes", JFE Technical Report No.7, Available at
http//www.jfesteel.co.jp/en/research/report/007/pdf/007-15.pdf (2006).
[48] Berry R.S., Rice S.A., Ross J., "Physical Chemistry", J. Wiley & Sons, New York (1980).
[49] "Physical Chemistry", Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987).
[50] O. Ø. Knudsen, J. I. Skar, "Cathodic Disbonding og Epoxy Coatings - Effects of Test Parameters", Corrosion 2008, Paper 08005 (Houston, TX: NACE (2008).
[51] Deflorian F., Rossi S., The role of Ions Diffusion in the Cathodic Delamination Rate of Organic Coated Steel, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 17: 291-306 (2003).